Well I have been browsing the Web lately and was looking for some interesting games to play. Often times I found myself being bored of watching the same layer of trailers over and over again. Some trailers sparked my interest and actually made me check out the game. I say that it is important to make a trailer, and gameplay videos that will reflect and attract gamers to that specific game. People who make trailers should be unique and try to attract gamer's with unique ideas.

Games with a well known name such as BattleField, and Call of Duty could produce a lower end trailer and still have more and more people attracted to it. So what do the lower end games should do? Make unique and amazing trailers/game play videos that will attract players in a explosive way so that they will try out the game. Even if the game does not sell to a specific individual, they may have checked the gameplay videos and various other videos relating to the game. As long as individual consum

Time and time again I am caught between multiple shooting games that change the overall controls. To make it worse some games do not give the option of changing some of the buttons to fit with your style. For example in PS3, in Call of Duty the aim button is on the top left L1 button, but in Killzone 2/3 the aiming button is located on R3 which is on the right analog. Why can't we have the same controls or the option to change the controls to suit our style? Also, I know games are trying to be unique but why did the developers lock the controls?

This is getting frustrating ruining the natural order of gaming. The natural order being gamer's knowing where the sprint, shoot, crouch, and reload is located on the gaming pad. Even then some games change the button config

So there is a huge debate a while ago arguing which game is the best among players to play. The choices for FPS slim down pretty well to the chart topping games such as battlefield, or Call of duty. But which one of these games are the best?

To get down what game I truly prefer, it is Battlefield>COD. Ok COD fans don't hate on me to quickly, because I thought call of duty was the best game up until MW3. The fast pace shooting, with a small map, and kill streaks was a pretty fun way to kill other players. But until I just recently bought BattleField 3, aside from playing the slower pace battlefield 1/2, I just felt that Battlefield 3 was a better game.

Battlefield 3 wasn't mindless shooting, and sprinting, it actually required a bit more strategy and skills. Rather than like in COD where I am killing 2 or 3 people and then getting killed from behind, I found that Battlefield had a better spawn position. I wasn't dying as much from getting killed right a